Against Human
Trafficking
Essay Response
In this essay I am in
favor on Prop.35 against human trafficking. In here I wanted to convince the
audience to vote YES on proposition 35.
This essay had a great
title and also in the intro the comment was that every quarter my writing just
build up!. On my essay since we were also looking at the different fallacies in
writing, I wanted to add some in my essay to look that I got the understanding
of the fallacies, but it did not work as I was expecting it on the lat
statement that I wrote in the second paragraph my teacher identify the fallacy.
The purpose itself did not work, my teacher took it as a mistake; in some way I
think is good because he find the intension of it, but it was a mistake n my
essay, so the points went down, what I did here was a false dichotomy and
appeal to fear and for this the argument went down.
Then on the third
paragraph I wanted to include politics, so I did an ad hominem. The politicians
as if it’s all of them, aren’t any support of it and do they all feel woman
deserve rape. I did not want to
sound like all politicians just some that I mentioned later on in the essay.
The next paragraph I have some great quotations to prove a powerful point about
some politicians (all the right by the way). It is that opponents of this
legislation seem to be anti-woman, anti feminist and against equality for
woman. I wanted to be somewhat specific in this since I see prove of how these
politicians were making bad commentaries about woman and rape. At the last
argumentative paragraph I talk about the budget, but it came out negative for
the essay; I did not focus on the budget so I mislead the audience to believe
that it will negatively affect the budget. The conclusion overall was good. I
need to focus on sentences and to focus on my paragraphs.
No comments:
Post a Comment